Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?

It is true that new technologies have had an influence on
communication
between people. Technology has affected relationships in various ways, and in my
opinion there
Accept comma addition
opinion, there
are both positive and negative effects. Technology has had an impact on relationships in business, education and social life.
Firstly
, telephones and the Internet allow business people in different countries to interact without ever meeting each other.
Secondly
, services like Skype create new possibilities for relationships between students and teachers.
For example
, a student can now take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country.
Finally
, many people use social networks, like Facebook, to make new friends and find people who share common interests, and they interact through their computers rather than face to face. On the one hand, these developments can be extremely positive. Cooperation between people in different countries was much more difficult when
communication
was limited to written letters or telegrams. Nowadays, interactions by email, phone or video are almost as good as face-to-face meetings, and many of us benefit from these interactions, either in work or social contexts.
On the other hand
, the availability of new
communication
technologies can
also
have the result of isolating people and discouraging real interaction.
For example
, many young people choose to make friends online rather than mixing with their peers in the real world, and these ‘virtual’ relationships are a poor substitute for real friendships. In conclusion, technology has certainly revolutionised
communication
between people, but not all of the outcomes of
this
revolution have been positive.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

What to do next:
Look at other essays:
  • The global phenomenon of urbanisation from the beginning of industrialisation to the present day has brought opportunity and prosperity, albeit at a cost in the quality of life. With an increasing city population, the complexity of the challenges also increases, the causes and solutions for this are outlined below.
  • In modern humanity a humongous number of the community dealing with severe illness, Because they are dealing only with cuisines. Yet the authority went through a new rule which is called "Taxation" especially on Junk foods. Through this movement I will provide my own perspective about this impact, then I will explore the idea of this pace, and how it will affect the nation. Firstly, I will describe fast snacks and the government rule of their obligation. First of all, I can say that dinners are everywhere and upon all generations they adore it, thus it is a beneficial business to the meal industries and restaurants such as; KFC, Hardee's and Macdonald which will be able to provide great support to keep their work on the road. But from my ,side I totally disagree about the authority rule to raise up taxes on junk foods because the results will be worst and hardship to the public to let them enjoy what they like the most such as; the community will suffer through limited resources to buy what they want, specifically on meals, then through this pace they will initiate a subordinate income to buy it, which they will disturb their plans to cover rental expenses as well as, the society will buy less food to feed their families due to high prices. Moreover, they are imposing for the raise will involve upon political barriers especially through economics wise, due to instability on currency status like what happened in Lebanon when the justice provoke by raise taxation on dessert directly it eliminates the power of the Dollar value although it provides bad results to the public to obtain their needs and wants. However, what I mentioned above upon the justice regulation will respawn multiple scenarios to control everything thoroughly on dinner, due to what the humans do when they like to eat, as well as get through tragic impact on their wellness for example; When they are dealing with junk feed consistently, they will become via serious illness such as; Diabetes, High Blood Pressure ,in addition, Heart attack. Furthermore, the justice could raise a variety of ways to encourage them to manage themselves between meals ls and natural foodstuff. To sum up, it is important to realise this move required patients to achieve great results, but the public should consider their instincts to control what they eat even if it is the cheap economy type of foods, they should consider balancing their eating habits and consist on daily training to keep their minds, and health well-being. I believe The regime should not implement this order to allow the association insight into what they eat because things will get worse for the people.
  • In the recent years, Social Media has driven a gigantic attention towards itself at a Global Level. Social Networking is an immensely common terminology that has been used these days. The introduction of this technology has both constructive and destructive impacts on Society. This essay will discuss both aspects by sharing some references, supporting the argument.
  • To argue with this topic, as we know, the news is a way to convey important messages or incidents from all around the world. In the early 19th century, most people receive their information from newspapers in spite of the advancement in technology not well developed. However, the news is an impact on our daily life. From the extent that I disagree with the ignorance idea with some people think about the news is irrelevant to connect in lives nowadays.
  • In recent times, pet-related injuries and mortalities have sparked heated debates about whether it is healthy for children to be around pets. In this essay,I shall argue that such dangers are overemphasised and that children receive substantive psychological benefits through having pets.