for different kind of crimes has become a debatable topic among citizens and legislators. While many people believe that criminals should be given the same penalty for all crimes, others argue that various circumstances and multiple motivations should be taken in consideration when assign a sentence.
essay will discuss both views in depth and why I completely disagree with similar
There are enormous reasons to reject
committing a crime is considered as a heinous behaviour that who committed should be given a considerable
, I believe that each crime has its conditions, background as well as
the different motivations
that induce offenders to execute a certain action.
, the law books differentiate between crimes and punishments.
, an individual, who defended himself from an armed thief and accidentally killed him should not be sentenced as a husband who killed his wife with full intention.
, it is not fair to punish children, who in many cases are not aware of their actions as adults. In short, judgments must review all of these factors and take them into account before the verdict announcement.
In the other hand, some of the beliefs encourage a fixed
system in order to obtain equality and to minimize discrimination among diverse groups.
method can ensure justice and equal rights for both black and white criminals in the USA.
, by selecting
, the judicial system efficiency will certainly increase due to the declined efforts of reviewing cases.
In other words
way of retribution will not only protect equality principles, but
will provide a realistic solution to the court’s burden.
essay discussed the advantages and disadvantages of fixed
for each type of crime. While there are several benefits of
system, I strongly believe that examination each crime’s circumstance and motivation
crucial to determine penalization.