In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

It is considered by some people that spending pay on building new railroads is a good idea while there are others who insist that it is better to use it for current public transport. In my opinion, I believe that money is essential for mending public transit because of the reasonable ticket and construction fee. To start with, it is possible to argue that a large amount of earnings should be spent on the installation of high-speed railway.
Firstly
, travelling by train is absolutely faster than public transport because it helps workers living far from their workplace commute easily. Take an example, it takes around one hour and a half to go from downtown of Hanoi to Vinh Phuc city by bus whereas just 30 minutes by train with the same distance.
Besides
,
this
rail transport system can enhance the development of cities. Not only do humans travel faster, but
also
goods will be shipped quickly.
On the other hand
, the idea that money is vital for public travel is supported by a lot of people due to a number of positive effects. It is obvious that commuting by public means is affordable, so all classes can access and use
this
type of transit.
For instance
, labourers with low earnings could not afford to commute by trains every day from the ticket is quite costly while they have to spend salary on a range of costs in their lives. Another point is that the government needs large sums of salary to construct the train network.
In other words
, these kinds of projects have a history of costing far more than their original budgets.
On the contrary
, improving existing transportation for the public does not require too much financial resources.
Therefore
, the government can use the funds for a lot of other purposes like medicine and education. In conclusion,
although
it is true that there are various benefits when wealth is used for building rail systems, I think the government should spend
this
fund on current public travel.
Submitted by ishahd8 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: