There should be laws to control the amount and type of violence shown on television programs. To what extent do u agree/ disagree with this statement.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?

It is true that there is violence on

Use synonyms

. But it is up to individual choice to watch it or not and I disagree with

this

Linking Words

point of view. Fortunately, we are all free to choose which

Use synonyms

shows we want to watch. Laws are not really necessary to help us decide. IT is

Accept space

not difficult to find what type of programs is airing on

Use synonyms

at any point of time. Most of the newspapers give information on

Use synonyms

programs along with their schedule.

Also

Linking Words

Anyone who watches

Use synonyms

programs regularly, he or she knows what kind of shows are airing on. Because of

this

Linking Words

it is easy to avoid programs which are inappropriate on

Use synonyms

. Modern technology has given us a tool for control and monitor programs we see. There is a feature like block a channel which is inappropriate to watch.

Linking Words

Thus parents

Accept comma addition

Thus, parents

can protect themselves Children from seeing the shows that are too violent. Adults can

also

Linking Words

use

this

Linking Words

technology to avoid showing, that they don't want to see. The best thing about

Use synonyms

is, It has a variety of programs

for instance

Linking Words

news programs for serious people

Accept space

cartoon and movies for those who want to be entertained, sports programs for game lovers. The variety of shows need to be protected if they show some violence . We each have own ideas about what is too violent and what isn't. It would be difficult to make laws that would satisfy everyone. It is better to let an individual make their decision.

16211a12a5Sun Mar 08 2020

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

Paragraph 1 - Introduction

Sentence 1 - Background statement
Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
Sentence 3 - Thesis
Sentence 4 - Outline sentence

Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 4 - Conclusion

Sentence 1 - Summary
Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

4
Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
1
Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3
Grammar mistakes
detected issues

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 4.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 6.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 6.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 4.0

Complete response

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

9 paragraphs

252 words

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 & Task 2 checks
Practice with essays, charts, and letters.
Personalized suggestions & mistake analysis
Spot every mistake and boost your score.
Topic ideas & vocabulary helpers
Expand your ideas and use the right words.
Progress tracking
Watch your writing improve with every practice.

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

5
band
In the past, most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else. Nowadays, most people live in large cities where they only know a few people in their area.
There is no doubt that we live in a world where the majority of people value accommodation in general more than ever before. In the old days we often heard that people lived together in a small village and almost everyone knew each other. Nowadays, there are many big cities being built and people tend to move here to live. However, when living here, people will have fewer relationships and can only know each other when they are near each other. I,myself,partly agree with both ideas, which will be discussed as below.
7
band
Some species of animals are almost extinct; and many others seem to be fast approaching a similar risk. What are the reasons for this? What should be done to solve this problem? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.
Nowadays, some animal species have almost extinct. And many others are prone to extinction as well. This essay will discuss the potential reasons Such as hunting. and suggest a few solutions to solve this issue.
7
band
Nowadays artificial intelligence is being used to drive cars. Why is this happening? Is it a positive or negative development?
Recently, many automobile companies have provided a car applying artificial intelligence to serve self-driving. This is attributed to the modern automobile industry’s advancements, and it should be seen as a positive progression since it reduces the pressure while driving.
4.5
band
More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone?
There is increase in the trend in individuals shifting their locations to big cities to achieve certain level of life standards. Although governments can make certain improvements by dividing big cities and improving the areas equally, there are still major issues in large places, such as crowded traffic and polluted air.
4.5
band
Some people argue that companies and private individual rather than government should pay the bills of pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that bills of pollution ought to pay companies and every individuals, not the government. In my opinion,i consider that the authorities are more responisble of rising pollution level rather than common citizan and enterprise.However,the government needs to pay all pollution bills regardless of limited law ristriction on companies and individual.

There should be laws to control the amount and type of violence shown on television programs. To what extent do u agree/ disagree with this statement.

Fully explain your ideas

In the past, most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else. Nowadays, most people live in large cities where they only know a few people in their area.

Some species of animals are almost extinct; and many others seem to be fast approaching a similar risk. What are the reasons for this? What should be done to solve this problem? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

Nowadays artificial intelligence is being used to drive cars. Why is this happening? Is it a positive or negative development?

More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone?

Some people argue that companies and private individual rather than government should pay the bills of pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?