"[T
he increased
of
is associated with a decrease in
of low-income and minority students."
quote from a study done by Amanda L. Griffith, a professor of economics at Wake Forest University, was cited in a statement calling for an end to
-based financial
which was issued by a group of private
presidents (Gardner). Making financial
entirely dependent upon “
” makes
education even more class and race entitled (and biased) than it is already. As Catherine Rampell wrote, “
metrics like SAT scores tend to closely correlate with family income; about 1 in 5 students from households with income over $250,000 receives
from his or her school. For families making less than $30,000, it’s 1 in 10” (Rampell).
, basing financial
for students on
serves to lock low-income people into poverty;
, regardless of whether it is intended or not,
-based financing
has racial and gender bias.
, the very term
-based is misleading. As Chelsea Jones put it, “There is a
in a term commonly used in higher education:
. The
of '
’ implies
or worthy of praise, but unfortunately, in
context,
is often synonymous with privilege.” The fact of the matter is, low-income students who cannot obtain
-based scholarships are just as smart as their higher-income counterparts who can get the
-based financial
but they happen to be unable to take part in the various extracurricular activities that play a big role in determining whether they are a star candidate for a
-based scholarship or not. A low-income
not only might not have the ability to attend extracurricular activities depending on where her or his school is located, and they might
have to work part-time just to make ends meet even if their school had those opportunities (Jones).
, are students with disabilities that make it difficult or impossible to participate in extracurricular activities, going to be less able to secure
-based financial
?
, single mothers who have one child or more to take care of,
to going class and possibly working on top of that, would be unfairly impacted by a decision to make government financial
for
's
-based.
would, and already does, make it gender-biased. That, in combination with the fact that women who are equally qualified still tend to get paid less than men for the same jobs, makes
sexist.
While the amount of money
dedicated to
-based financial
increases, the amount of money available for
financial
proportionately decreases.
, while the amount of
-based financial
increases,
, the number of students who receive
- IE Pell Grant- decreases. The result is fewer black students on the campus:
Griffith, an assistant professor of economics at Wake Forest University, found that “the
of
is associated with changes in the socioeconomic and racial composition of the
body.” According to the report, within three to five years of introducing a
program, the two top tiers of private colleges saw their share of Pell Grant recipients fall by 6 percentage points. At bottom-tier schools, the proportion of Pell Grant recipients
ultimately dropped by 2 percentage points within 10 years of the creation of
a program. The study
found that the introduction of a
program led to a reduction in the representation of black students at top-tier schools (
.
Burd 5).
Another problem with
-based financial
is that colleges and universities are dedicating a lot of resources to attracting “desirable” students who are high scoring and have high achievements.
is all to enhance the university’s prestige. But what of everyone else? What of those who have disabilities or those who must help take care of siblings or other relatives with disabilities?
, what of the students who have to work part-time or even full time to get by and are not able to spend as much time on their classwork as they would like, or as their classwork really requires, having lower grades
?
, what of the LGBTQ students, particularly LGBTQ students of
colora visual attribute of things that results from the light they emit or transmit or reflect
? David Johns, executive director of the National Black Justice Coalition, (a civil rights organization focused on the empowerment of LGBTQ people) and former executive director of the White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for African Americans, summarized it by saying:
The ability for postsecondary institutions to provide credentials, certificates and degrees that are required for certain types of jobs are
stratified or
marginalizing individuals who are from communities that are most under supported or least likely to
have access to the high-quality schools…without
financial
(qtd.
Elfman). Making
-based only for them effectively shuts them out.
Statistically speaking, there is plenty of evidence showing that white students are
likely to receive
-based financial
than students of
colora visual attribute of things that results from the light they emit or transmit or reflect
(Racial Breakdown of Financial
). At the same time, black and Chicana people earn less than white people do (Kochhar and Cilluffo). Taken together, making financial
-based only serves to
entrap people of
colora visual attribute of things that results from the light they emit or transmit or reflect
in a vicious cycle of poverty and inequality. It is white supremacist regardless of whether
the intent of those who try to implement it. In a country that disproportionately incarcerates people of
colora visual attribute of things that results from the light they emit or transmit or reflect
, people who get out of prison and want to try to restart their lives by getting a
degree will find it much more difficult to do so in Georgia which has absolutely no
financial
. All financial
is
-based (Total Grant
Awarded).
In conclusion, making government financial
for students based solely on
has already been shown to be an unmitigated disaster for the low-income, disabled, working mothers and people of
colora visual attribute of things that results from the light they emit or transmit or reflect
. It amounts to educational apartheid and as already stated, it means that government
pretty much becomes available only to those who least need it. To paraphrase Catherine Rampell, who is, in turn quoting, Mark Kantrowitz, the publisher at Edvisors.
, for low-income students, the six-year graduation rate is 45 percent when grants cover one-quarter of the
costs, but it goes up to 68 percent when grants cover three-fourths of the
cost; looking at the statistics for high-income students though, the graduation rates are about 78 percent either way.
,
-based financing has
been shown to cause lower
attendance for non-white students. Education needs to be viewed as an irrevocable right and not a privilege,
only must we no longer consider
-based
financial
programs. We must go beyond that and enact federal laws that prohibit states from using
-based financial
programs and force the states which are currently using
-based financial
to immediately discontinue that practice and return to the
of
financial
.