The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued if the
government
should spend more money on critical issues like global farming and cut down on local environmental problems.
Although
I agree that increasing funding into global warming is important, I think that solving local environmental problems could be beneficial. On the one hand, the
government
should definitely allocate a bigger part of its budget to global warming.
This
threatening phenomenon has been causing a set of catastrophic changes
to
Suggestion
in
the Earth
such
as increasing average temperatures, extreme weather events, ice melting, sea levels rising
,
Accept space
,
etc
continuing in the same way
etc.
..
Therefore
, the economic and human cost caused by global warming is immeasurable. With proper financing, climate change could be slowed down significantly.
For example
,
electricity which
Accept comma addition
electricity, which
is mostly powered by fossil fuels and
accordingly
emits an enormous amount of CO2 could be produced entirely by renewable resources with more funding in research. That’s why the
government
should adequately spend on climate warming in the
first
place.
On the other hand
, local environmental problems should
also
be well funded.
Firstly
,
Accept space
,
improving local habitat would
also
improve our current climate situation because local environment is undeniably a part of
global environment
Suggestion
a global environment
the global environment
.
Moreover
, taking
actions
Suggestion
action
on local problems would assuredly spread more environmental awareness for the locals which partly makes them take more responsible actions in
favor
promote over another
favour
of the environment.
Thus
, the authorities should
also
spend more money on local issues. In conclusion, I think that the
government
should wisely distribute its budget between solving threatening environmental problems and local problems to slow down and recover from global warming.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • urgent issues
  • global warming
  • local environmental problems
  • funding
  • redirecting funds
  • broader environmental health
  • financial efficiency
  • return on investment
  • cost-effective
  • holistic approach
  • moral and ethical considerations
  • resource allocation
  • long-term consequences
  • short-term impacts
  • competing environmental concerns
What to do next:
Look at other essays: