Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Nowadays fixed punishments have been widely adopted for a variety of criminal behaviours.

an

Suggestion

An

opposite view of

this

plural of "this"

these

ideas argue

Suggestion

ideas, argues

ideas argues

idea argue

idea idea argue

that courts should explore the motivations of a

crime

and situations when they are committing illegal behaviours. In the essay, I will outline both views and propose my opinions regarding whether punishments should be sentenced case by case or not. It is

offten

many times at short intervals

often

said that standardised punishment in

an

Suggestion

a

criminal event is a good way for the public and society as a whole, because casualties are more likely to receive a fair treat after being

hurted

be the source of pain

hurt

or killed.

For example

, a murder is usually given a death penalty or life sentence in Taiwan, and

victim's familty

Suggestion

the victim's family

victim's family

may fell

Suggestion

may feel

may felt

more

peacful

not disturbed by strife or turmoil or war

peaceful

after the court hearing.

In addition

, the public can realise what cost they would need to pay if they try to participate in a

crime

even through it is a petty

crime

. A driver who

think

Suggestion

thinks

about not the fine before breaking traffic laws on the road, which could

rise

raise the level or amount of something

raise

people's awareness.

As a result

, drivers may consider more carefully when they like to break laws and regulations.

On the other hand

, defendants decided to

commite

perform an act, usually with a negative connotation

commit

commute

comment

crimes that may be caused by a range of reasons from finance to family, so the criminal court should discover these behind their actions by knowing motivations and impulse. If homeless people do not have enough food sources to pass on the winter and

stell

with reference to action or condition; without change, interruption, or cessation

still

foods from the supermarket,

prosecutives

a government official who conducts criminal prosecutions on behalf of the state

prosecutors

should realise

thier

of them or themselves

their

there

criminal behaviour is driven by

hungery

a physiological need for food; the consequence of food deprivation

hunger

, and make a proper sentence

instead

of judging everyone in the same way. One

another

not the same one or ones already mentioned or implied

other

reason to support

this

view is that since the majority of criminals from poverty and poor social background, and they may face difficulty situations which may lead them to join in gun

crime

. As a consequence, they are

on

Suggestion

in

at

the high risk of being a prisoner. In conclusion,

although

fixed punishment may relieve the anger of the

publilc

not private; open to or concerning the people as a whole

public

, victim and society, prosecutors and

lawers

a professional person authorized to practice law; conducts lawsuits or gives legal advice

lawyers

might spend more time to know about their defendants before making final judgement in penalty. In my view, I strongly agree that

punishment

Suggestion

the punishment

should be made based on people's situation because of the

crime

prevention

.

Accept space

.