Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued by many people that the increasing price of

fuel

is the most effective method to address worldwide environmental issues.

However

, I tend to believe that it is not the most effective way since it may cause other problematic issues for the population of the world.

To begin

with, vehicles are considered one of the major factors leading to environmental problems

such

as air pollution. As cars exhaust toxic fumes, they present dire threats to the natural world.

Nevertheless

, people are unwilling to stop driving private cars

,

Accept space

,

even realizing the aftermath of the

overconsumption

of petrol.

Thus

, growth in the

cost

of

fuel

will not cut down global demand for petrol in order to eradicate environmental problems.

On the other hand

,

Accept space

,

a

rise

in the price of

fuel

can lead to a multitude of difficulties for some countries.

First

of all, it might have an adverse impact on the economy, which will generate challenging circumstances for population. As the

cost

of petrol increases, it will cause utility bills to

rise

,

such

as electricity, water or gas.

Furthermore

,

Accept space

,

a growth in the

cost

of living may pose financial hardships to people, which even can result in the

rise

in the unemployment rate.

Lastly

, rising

fuel

costs can have a detrimental effect on the airline industry. It is undeniable that ticket prices and additional fees will

rise

because of the increase in the

cost

of airline

fuel

. As a consequence, the number of passengers who want to travel by air might decrease. To conclude, increasing the

cost

of

fuel

is not the most reasonable way to resolve environmental issues. In my opinion, there are some alternative options to address environmental problems by raising people’s awareness about

this

global emergency.