Some children find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy too difficult to learn, so some people argue that those subjects should be optional rather than compulsory. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays

,

Accept space

,

the

math

is taught to be able to think critically and rationally in some scientific fields or daily life

,

Accept space

,

while the

science

of

philosopy

a belief (or system of beliefs) accepted as authoritative by some group or school

philosophy

is existed to assimilate and comprehend the essence of social relationships and organisation.Some argue that it ought to be obligatory to be

aware profoundly

Suggestion

profoundly aware

of both of

science

,

Accept space

,

whilst the others claim that it should be optional to choose the philosophy in terms of inquisitiveness which children display in the curricula.I support the concept of those who think that the children should opt based on whether they want that the

philosopy

a belief (or system of beliefs) accepted as authoritative by some group or school

philosophy

philosopher

is taught or not.

To begin

with

,

Accept space

,

the

math

skills are so crucial which everyone

need

Suggestion

needs

to meet

this

requirement.

For instance

,

Accept space

,

while any person is applying for

vacancy

Suggestion

vacancies

a vacancy

,

Accept space

,

that person is needed to have enough

math

knowledge

,

Accept space

,

as it is compulsory in terms of being able to think analytically in order to be in charge of business

productively

Suggestion

production

.

That is

why to teach the numeracy to children from their early ages plays

a

Suggestion

an

essential role in the developing the children's mindset efficiently.So that the teachers should try to do their utmost in order to teach certain formulations of proofs and some concepts in the schools.In

this

way

,

Accept space

,

initiatively

in an intuitive manner

intuitively

the children can move up the knowledge path by immersing in the

math

from schools to universities or colleges due to curricula related to mathematics. Turning to the

philosopy

a belief (or system of beliefs) accepted as authoritative by some group or school

philosophy

,

Accept space

,

the children can find so

teduous

so lacking in interest as to cause mental weariness

tedious

to learn it

,

Accept space

,

as

this

science mainly give

Suggestion

science, mainly gives

science mainly gives

the information associated with the underlying meanings of

universe

Suggestion

the universe

.

However

the very young people

,

Accept space

,

in particular

little ones may be reluctant to possess

these knowledge

Suggestion

this knowledge

because of being immature still and it can arise exceedingly challenging

to

Suggestion

for

them to analyse the truth behind the

complexeties

the quality of being intricate and compounded

complexities

complexity

of human relationships in schools.

This

science

can be learned by those who are willing to seek for every angle of

this

field and enjoy being

absorb

Suggestion

absorbed

in each pattern of philosophy.

Moreover

,

Accept space

,

there is not any need to make the

cheildren

a young person of either sex

children

to learn

this

science

as it can

also

be

taughtin

Suggestion

taught in

high schools

such

as universities or colleges. To conclude

,

Accept space

,

I believe that if

this

choice of philosophy be optional

,

Accept space

,

the process of comprehending the curricula may be more effective compared to which is forced to learn that

science

.

However

,

Accept space

,

it should be

considired

carefully weighed

considered

mandotory

required by rule

mandatory

to have

math

skills from earlier ages.