Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees, while others have free entry. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages?

While there are some museums and galleries whose visitors have to buy a ticket, others let them enter for free.
Although
having free entry may encourage the local people to take a look at these places, it will be useless for the host as money is needed for renovations and other services. In my opinion, the advantages of charging for
admission
outweigh the disadvantages. In fact, tourism is a really important source of income for any country, an advantage, that would have been
otherwise
impossible if
admission
to museums had been free of charge.
Moreover
, Galleries' owners need these
admission
fees in order to provide a good quality of service offered to those who come and visit the place.
For example
, Egypt has twenty percent of the annual national income stemming from tourism.
Therefore
, charging tourists for entry is not only acceptable, but
also
essential.
On the contrary
, paying a lot to visit a historical place is somehow frustrating to the native population.
Furthermore
, they will feel less appreciated because they don't have to be charged while seeing the monuments of their own country.
For example
, Japan makes sure to organize monthly school trips to the national places of interest without charging their children anything in return. It is for these reasons, it is preposterous to think that everyone should pay to visit a gallery whether a tourist or not. In conclusion, some historical and artistic fair charge people for
admission
,
however
, it's not the case everywhere where you have to pay nothing in similar but different locations. Despite having a major advantage of contributing to the economic boost, making the national population frustrated because they aren't supposed to be paying
such
fees is a significant disadvantage. From my perspective, the benefits of
such
a situation outweigh the disadvantages.
Submitted by dinaalaaaliabd on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: