Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant’s past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree?

In England and Australia, a jury is not allowed to have ay information about the

offende’s

a lack of politeness; a failure to show regard for others; wounding the feelings or others

offences

offender’s

offenders

past. Some

lawers

a professional person authorized to practice law; conducts lawsuits or gives legal advice

lawyers

suggest that having the past criminal record will help the judge make a judgement

more accurately

Suggestion

more accurate

. From my point of view,

this

issue should be

cosidered

carefully weighed

considered

carefully because

this

is a big area. Actually, the

lawers

a professional person authorized to practice law; conducts lawsuits or gives legal advice

lawyers

who try to reduce the level of the crime. So they find some positive points related to his/her past.

For example

, if a person has never committed a crime in a past, the court can rely on

its

the thing named or in question

it

to reduce their sentences. .

Image

Suggestion

The image

being in a murder trial, whether you want to know about the defendant’s past or not? Maybe they do so just for self-

defense

(military) military action or resources protecting a country against potential enemies

defence

or they have certain suffering that

can not

can not

cannot

be told.

Therefore

, comprehensive understanding helps to prevent the misunderstanding and

misjudgement

A wrong or unjust judgment

misjudgment

.

On the other hand

, social prejudices about people’s past are often

unconsiously

without awareness

unconsciously

affectted

acted upon; influenced

affected

evicted

from what happened in the past. If the guilty person

does not committed

Suggestion

does not commit

the crime, the negative influence of his/her past might define

him

male possessive pronoun

his

/her criminal. In terms of fairness, the defendant would not encounter with unjustified

judgement just

Accept comma addition

judgement, just

because of some minor previous mistakes. In short, to judge a person should not base on

a

Suggestion

an

aspect but the whole things. A jury should have sufficient

envident

Suggestion

evidence

evident

and depend on the

seversity

used of the degree of something undesirable e.g. pain or weather

severity

of the case. The defendant’s past criminal record could be a piece of convincing evidence that makes it easier to solve, sometimes the opposite.