Some people think that only staff who worked in a company for a long time should be promoted to higher positions. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and examples.

Promotions help boost the morale of employees. Higher positions earn higher salaries and

hence

everyone wants to be promoted. Some people feel that only those employees who have worked for an

organization

for several years should be given

promotion

Suggestion

a promotion

. I don’t agree with

this

view. In my opinion, the time spent in an

organization

should be just one of the criteria for determining an employee’s eligibility for

promotion

. Employers often believe that employees who have spent a lot of years in an

organization

are more likely to be loyal to it. They tend to reward

this

loyalty with promotions and rises. I am not against promoting senior employees.

However

, in my opinion, new hires too should be promoted if they have the skills and qualifications. Just because someone has spent ten or twenty years in an

organization

, it does not mean that they are the most competent. Sometimes new employees deliver better performance than senior employees because they possess more skills and qualifications. What’s more, a ‘new employee’ may have years of experience in another

organization

. If competent employees are denied

promotion

because they don’t have years of experience in the

organization

, it will affect their morale. Worse, it may encourage them to quit and join another company that honours talent. Attrition will only hurt the interests of an

organization

. To conclude, in my opinion, employers should consider a variety of factors while determining an employee’s eligibility for

promotion

.

This

includes their qualifications, special skills and domain expertise. Promotions and rises encourage employees to work harder. If they are denied

promotion

in spite of their hard work and eligibility, they might just quit.