Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is believed by many that the government must preserve an archaic or
language
of small regions,
however
others have opposite meaning. My opinion in a full agreement with a
first
community.
This
essay explains view both of debaters from two sides: a legacy of ancestors and inevitable modification of a local
language
.
First
, saving almost a dying
language
means to keep
memory
Suggestion
memories
the memory
about our ancient time, about local of traditions and rituals.
Moreover
, archaeologists throughout the time by a digging find out new fragments antique languages that had lost among centuries that help better understanding culture of ancient people now,
however
, many are lost irrevocably.
In addition
, many countries still have two languages in everyday life.
For instance
, English intertwines archaic and modern tongue plus a
little
Suggestion
few
of
words
Suggestion
the words
from an archaic French especially it heard in church. Another example, the Ukrainian
have
Suggestion
has
exciting mix
Suggestion
an exciting mix
ancient and newly of words;
however
, only in small villages.
Consequently
, we should preserve
language
for other people in the future.
Secondly
, time changes with technologies and our needs, so old words replaced by modern ones.
Moreover
, inasmuch as many families are accumulated knowledge and preserve ancient languages from a generation to a generation without
support
Suggestion
the support
of
govern
Suggestion
governing
; citizens could preserve languages by themselves.
In addition
, many languages of small regions
is
Suggestion
are
mix
Suggestion
mixed
tongues from different countries without any cultural weight, thereby spent money on it useless.
Hence
, probably better leave
this
process on people’s shoulders. In general, my opinion that saving the mother tongue case of families not government
that
is corresponded
Suggestion
corresponds
to
facts
Suggestion
the facts
is presented previously which should convince even opposition in my view.
Submitted by ilua.cavchuk on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS

Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!
What to do next:
Look at other essays:

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!