In some countries , criminal trials are shown on television for the public. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

In recent years, criminal trials have been televised in some countries to allow the public an opportunity to watch them. If asked, I tend to believe that it has
more fruitful outcome
Suggestion
a more fruitful outcome
than being disadvantageous and in the
enusing
following immediately and as a result of what went before
ensuing
paragraphs I will allude to these arguments
further
. Discussing the merits, the principle advantage is showing criminal proceeding on the television is that the entire judicial systems is open to the public to watch and supervise. While
general public
Suggestion
the general public
is
knowing
Suggestion
known
about
legel
established by or founded upon law or official or accepted rules
legal
right and crime laws. Foe example, western countries where the minor hearing to be broadcasted on TV because of the aim is reducing crime and awareness of people. Another benefit is that opening the doors of the
court room
a room in which a lawcourt sits
courtroom
allows the public rights to information.
This
phenomenon affects in different ways and people gain some detail about laws.
Finally
, judging the criminals on social media, the national police force is showing their power to the citizen.
However
, the crime rate would be reduced and
this
positive change will be lead people to a peaceful life.
On the contrary
, there are some drawbacks of showing judicial proceeding on TV. The main disadvantage is the coverage that the criminals can turn them
in to
expresses motion to a point on, or within, something
into
a
celabrity
a widely known person
celebrity
.
This
can negatively influence on
young
Suggestion
the younger
younger
generation.
For instance
, in America Simon hearing broadcast on the online
platfrom
a raised horizontal surface
platform
, he is addicted to the drugs, after that drugs consumption increase. In
further
conflict, governments do not have a right to show people life. In conclusion, I firmly believe that the advantages are more than
drawbacks
Suggestion
the drawbacks
an dthis
Suggestion
and this
trend is still beneficial to both the society and the government, but negative side do not
ignored
Suggestion
ignore
.
Submitted by ppparthpatel906 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • transparency
  • public oversight
  • judicial system
  • educational value
  • privacy concerns
  • re-traumatizing
  • juror behavior
  • fairness
  • public opinion
  • media sensationalism
  • impartiality
  • economic benefits
  • legal proceedings
  • misinterpretation
  • broadcasters
  • legal institutions
What to do next:
Look at other essays: