Many people regard the film as less important art forms than literature and paintings. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, the other

art

forms are considered more significant as compared to movies by the masses. I am wholly against the notion because cinema is one of the best sources to convey information, and even illiterate individuals can

also

learn through it. To commence with, films are the best way to portray any story and event that occurred in the past because the visuals mot only create interest of people in the story, but

also

help them to understand the situation.

For example

, in a recent survey, it is found that almost 70 percent of people in the world watch movies to learn about history rather than reading it because they find it difficult to read and understand, so they prefer movies.

Hence

, films play a substantial role to convey information.

Moreover

, movies cater to a larger audience than other

art

forms as the maximum number of people prefer to watch films rather than going to any exhibition.

Besides

, the illiterate masses can

also

learn about history and culture through it.

For instance

, the literacy rate in India is approximately 70 percent, and these literate people can read about their forefathers from the books, but the rest 30 percent cannot do it since they do not know how to read.

Consequently

, films are essential to display the past.

Therefore

, it is apparent that movies are

also

a significant form of

art

. To summarize, literature and paintings are an excellent form of

art

,

however

less important as compared with the movies. In my opinion, movies are necessary as it portrays the events as well as helps everyone to gain knowledge about forefathers.