Although
 there is no doubt that crime must be punished, it is important to consider which type of  penal Linking Words
system
 is most appropriate. Use synonyms
While
 some believe that a Linking Words
system
 of fixed sentences should be  adopted, I support the view that Use synonyms
punishments
 should be based on motives and circumstances.  Those who advocate implementing a judicial process of set Use synonyms
punishments
 may argue that Use synonyms
this
 would  make criminal trials more efficient. Linking Words
For example
, once a jury has decided a particular defendant is  guilty of murder, the judge need only refer to the ‘punishment for murder’ to sentence that person  to life imprisonment. The benefit of Linking Words
this
 is that a huge amount of time would be saved in court, Linking Words
thus
  leading to significant financial savings. Linking Words
As a result
, more money could be spent on healthcare,  education and welfare.  Linking Words
However
, I would argue that the above Linking Words
system
 is too rigid, and a process of ‘flexible’ Use synonyms
punishments
  is much fairer. The latter punishment Use synonyms
system
, which many countries use, leaves more room for  compassion toward offenders who have been blackmailed or manipulated. Use synonyms
For instance
, under Linking Words
this
  Linking Words
system
, if a thief is able to prove that he had been bullied into committing his crime, he should be  sentenced to less prison time than a thief who had been motivated by greed. If, Use synonyms
instead
, fixed  Linking Words
punishments
 were implemented, Use synonyms
this
 sense of fairness and morality would be lost.  In conclusion, Linking Words
while
 a legal Linking Words
system
 of fixed Use synonyms
punishments
 might be more cost-effective and efficient,  a procedure of assessing crimes based on circumstances and motives is more just, and justice, in  my view, is paramount.Use synonyms