In order to solve traffic problems government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.
Advantage and disadvantages?
Nowadays, Traffic is one of the most important problems around the world. So authority has taken various steps to control traffic problems. The ministry's takes a step to control traffic problems through taxation, but it has certain limitations too. Above essay will examine the pros and cons of state should tax private machine owners heavily and provide a logical conclusion.
The most important benefit is minister's should impose heavy taxes to private auto owners and collect all the funds and spend money to improve public transportation. Nowadays public transport is not good. The other benefit is, if ministries impose more taxes most of the private car owners don't drive an automobile for their it is the working hours. It is a correct time to protect the air pollution. Private car owners stopped their service automatically public transport must develop multidimensional and get revenue from the public.
On the others hand, there are some limitations too.Authority imposes the taxes to private bus owners that time motor owners are affecting their life and they are facing a lot of problems in their life. Most of the auto owners don't know any other job they are always depending that job only, For instance, if they give up and go any other work they don't work professionally.That action creates problems between employee and employer.
In my conclusion, It's not a way to develop public transportation. Ministry's should find out alternative solution to improve public transport facilities and some time power should take various steps to control private wagon owners.Though the state impose taxes to private wagon owners heavily, It is not for the best solution.
Submitted by kgsambath on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
Paragraph 1 - Introduction
Sentence 1 - Background statement
Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
Sentence 3 - Thesis
Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion
Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion
Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
Sentence 1 - Summary
Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.
It is certainly true that the increased number of elderly population brings some drawbacks for governments. However, it is my belief that the positive effects of this phenomenon could certainly offset its disadvantages.
In modern society, people’s perspectives on education and healthcare have diverged. With the evolving social landscape, the question of whether the government should provide education and healthcare accessible to all without charge has become a matter of considerable debate. In my opinion, I firmly agree with the notion that the government should supply education and healthcare free of charge to the public.
Recently, it has been an unrefuted fact that death punishment for criminals is a paramount method to control the rate of violent cases in most countries. Personally, I fundamentally support the assertion for two major reasons.