Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It was often argued that richer countries should take in more refugees and help them with daily needs.

This

essay totally agrees with

this

statement because of moral reason and that they have the capacity to help those in need in the world. One of the reasons is that they have the moral responsibility to help these people who escaped from their motherland. They are forced to leave their home town to seek for a safer place to live and not only for themselves, but for

thier

of them or themselves

their

next

generations. If these nations refuse to help them, they will be in danger or have a risk to be killed.

For example

, in Syria, thousands of refugees were caught up during wars and a lot of them had lost their lives saving their children. The other reason that the more developed states should let refugees enter

thier

of them or themselves

their

borders is because they have the financial capacity to not only keep them in the country but

also

to feed and provide homes for them. Countries like Canada and UK have been collecting billions of tax income annually for government operation. Only a small portion of the money will be enough to feed and

accomodate

be agreeable or acceptable to

accommodate

these

foriegn

of concern to or concerning the affairs of other nations (other than your own)

foreign

people in need.

For example

, the GDP of Canada is 23

billions

Suggestion

billion

and it only takes less than 1

billions

Suggestion

billion

to settle all refugees from Syria. In conclusion, countries with sufficient resources should accept refugees and supply for their basic living because it is their moral duty to help people in the world that are in need and they have the resources to help them to establish a better life.