Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

There have existed endless discussions over companies’ problems, especially the demands of employers.

This

results in conflicting views on whether the work’s quality or

appearance

is more important.

This

burning issue will be critically demonstrated in

this

paper. What I put my priority is that work’s quality is for success in the future. Most businesses’ achievement comes from the high quality of work’s process, some of them might not require other subsidiary criteria, doctors, mechanics, engineers

for instance

. Not all people have an attractive

appearance

,

hence

, efforts are necessary which is taken as an impetus of setting goals.

In addition

,

this

could minimise favouritism in occupational areas, have justice, resulting in contributing to a professional workplace as well as be satisfied with it.

On the other hand

, the advantage of personal

appearance

is what cannot be left out when considering, which I believe is an additional factor. With attractive

appearance

, particularly clever wearing would increase confidence as well as employment chances which are key factors in several fields

such

as fashion, entertainment.

For example

, when having an appointment with partners or doing customers’ services, the staff would be the representative of their company,

thus

, their look would be the

first

impression to the other, and having a good looking is a substantial merit for them. While there may be some truth in

this

, obsessed with the outfits could lead to negligence in work’s productivity which is the main standard. Sum up the main points, it is undeniable that most enterprises have their individual guidances, particularly people have their own life decisions.

However

, balancing both two these elements would bring significant outcomes, especially gaining meaningful experiences.