Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent eleswhere. To what extent to you agree with this veiw?

Arts sometimes reflect the heritage of the

country

. While some people believe that the

government

can invest money in other means Rather than spending on the arts, I believe that the

government

must not neglect the arts and should invest partial funds in the arts and most of the amount in the transport system of the

country

. The

government

should contribute a quarter percentage of its funds to save the monuments of the

country

. Which represents the

country

's beauty and its culture to the world.

For instance

, if regular maintenance is performed to

such

kind of vintage craft work and the architecture of the buildings,

then

it will remain the same appearance to the public as it was before.

As a result

, to save the iconic construction of the

country

, the

government

should consider some funds into the arts.

On the other hand

, facilities to the citizens is paramount. So the

government

must divert its majority of money to the transport system. Which make locals more convenient means of travelling to work or any other purpose.

For Example

, investing more in infrastructure of the

country

and in the betterment of the railway sector,

such

as train, trams and underground will be more practical and feasible for individuals. As a consequence,

this

service will promote frequent travelling. In conclusion,

Although

investing some finance in the arts is necessary as it keeps the historical buildings maintained, But the diverting major portion of the budget should be for developing the

country

's transportation services because it provides daily service to the citizens.

Therefore

, the advantages to the citizen through

this

service outweigh any minor benefits it might bring from the arts.