decade, there has been an ongoing argument that politicians should take responsibility for the
of the environment, since individuals are powerless to make a change.
political figures should place a premium on environmental
, individuals are to jointly share
There are a number of reasons to believe that politicians play a crucial role in mitigating pollution.
, since environmental degradation is caused by heavy industrialisation, only the government has sufficient authority to hold these factories accountable.
, by imposing environmental taxes on industries which are consuming a great deal of fossil fuel, the state can curb their carbon emission and force them to use renewable energy.
, only the government can organise and finance, environmental movements at a large scale, which proves to be much more impactful than an individual’s effort. In fact, since no single citizen can attract enough funds as well as support for a significant change without political aid, their endeavour may be in vain.
, individuals are set to shoulder the burden of environmental
in tandem with politicians.
, since they are the building blocks of society, the common citizens are the driving force needed for every transformation. In fact, any environmental movement, regardless of its scale, requires the support of the public, which means that individual involvement is imperative for every significant victory in the war on pollution.
, individuals are the most vulnerable before environmental degradation, which implies that they should be in pole position to combat it.
means that pollution puts peoples' lives in jeopardy, inducing them to make a stand and protect the environment in which their well.
political initiatives are of paramount importance to environmental
, public support is not to be overlooked. Politicians and individuals should join forces for the betterment of the environment.