Some people think the governments should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles in order to solve the environments problems. to what extent do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
These days, there is an ongoing discussion between people about the potential benefits to the environment when fuel emissions were reduced. While some people suggest the authorities to raise gas costs, in order to address
this
Linking Words
issue, it may not be practical considering the broader scenario.
Hence
Linking Words
, I completely do not agree with
this
Linking Words
approach. In
this
Linking Words
essay, I shall explain the reasons behind my disagreement with the given statement, and provide examples as required.
To begin
Linking Words
with, transportation fuels are an essential commodity that supports most segments of the daily necessities in the modern human life,
such
Linking Words
as to produce and transport food. Fundamentally, if their prices go up, it will funnel down into almost all aspects of the human support system. As
such
Linking Words
, food prices may skyrocket and become inaccessible to the poor and needy.
Next
Linking Words
, harmony in the society could get disturbed, leading to increased crime. In Somalia,
for example
Linking Words
, when the local governing body imposed 200 percentage taxes on petrol, the country experienced significant inflation overnight and almost collapsed the local economy. Moving
further
Linking Words
, the environment,
on the other hand
Linking Words
, is going through a lot of change nowadays. The climate change is clearly visible; as
such
Linking Words
, the global temperatures are clearly going up every year, and the icebergs are melting rapidly. Considering these factors, it is
therefore
Linking Words
, important to safeguard our planet. So, rather than hiking the fuel costs, it would be ideal to develop alternate solutions to move vehicles. Tesla,
for instance
Linking Words
, is a great example, it runs on electricity and is carbon neutral. In conclusion, it is our duty to protect our surroundings,
however
Linking Words
, not at the cost of human existence. For
this
Linking Words
reason, I totally disagree with the given statement and recommend the government to fund research into developing alternative fuels.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: