Artists need a certain amount of freedom to develop their creativity. Some people think that artists should have total freedom to express any thoughts and ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Over the years, it is believed that artists play an imperative role to represent social and cultural aspects of their innovative approach.

However

, it is frequently discussed whether to give them full liberty, to transform their imagination into the real canvas of life, or restrict them partially. I opine there should be enough freedom to represent their artwork but without humiliating public's sentiments. To embark on, there are numerous reason to allow individuals to express their artistic work.

First

of all, they can highlight enormous social evils and bring them to the surface. Their in-depth observation and interpretation will provide awareness to the public about ongoing circumstance on one hand, and due sympathies to the sufferers. To illustrate, there are a number of renowned artist worldwide, who have stimulated human rights activists by portraying domestic violence, gender discrimination and other piercing issues.

Additionally

, being non-constraint, they are able to develop masterpieces in a stress free environment, which can be a source of recognition their country.

This inturn

Accept comma addition

This, in turn

This in turn

, motivate youngsters to join

this

field and play their part to enhance the cultural heritage of the nation.

On the other hand

, people believe that everyone has to follow certain norms to maintain the supremacy of the profession. Undue freedom to express any controversial issue may result in violence and aggression in the community.

For instance

, Amir Khan a renowned produces, has had to face strong criticism after launching a film on superstitious beliefs of Indians.

Furthermore

, presenting very conflicting cases, without restrictions may embark similar behaviour among the youngsters.

Hence

, every demonstration at public level must be censured. To conclude, restricting the presenter will hold an obstacle in awareness and acknowledgment of national assets.

However

, they must be rational in their expressions to sustain peace of the society.