It is important that artisans should be given a sufficient freedom to make them more creative.In my opinion, they must be given opportunity to exhibit their viewpoints freely. In complete agreement of this notion, the forthcoming essay is going to elaborate it more.
Societies sometimes pose restrictions on the ways of expression, which not only makes it difficult to express what is in the mind of an artist. Therefore, some people think that artists should be given full liberty in order to represent themselves by the piece of art which they are addict in like painting, music. While some people contradict this by saying that it is against the laws of any country and nobody is allowed to do anything for which the country law don’t allow to do. I personally disagree with the former view and in this I will discuss this scenario based on the examples of Oxford University research and Time Magazine survey to demonstrate points and support claims.
It is considered by most of the people that artists should be given the freedom to express views and creativity through their art and painting. Contrary to this, others opine that there should be some restrictions on artists as complete freedom may be detrimental to public. In my view, I think that artists should have an adequate amount of freedom to express their art. However, I also believe that there should be few rules and regulations so that their creativity does not deter societal growth.
Art is an amalgamation of thoughts and feelings of an artist. Therefore, it is required to give them full freedom for best outcome from an artist. However, some people are totally against with this statement. I surely agreed that freedom is necessary for an artist but it should be given with keeping in mind of society.
Art requires the right of expression. I agree that for the development of innovative ideas and creativity, enough freedom should be given to artists but total freedom is not necessary.
Many people believe that artists require freedom to express their ideas. I agree with that opinion, however, I think total freedom is not necessary but only a certain amount is required.
Nowadays, due to the low income rate in the art industry, some people believe a demand for government's financial support is necessary. In my point of view, this is redundant because the money may go to the wrong person, and artists these days can earn more easily with the help of technology.
Artists require the ability of expression to some extent to develop innovative ideas. Some people argue that full opportunity to express any opinion or ideas need to be given to artists. In my opinion, artists should be given enough power to express their ideas, but total right is not required.
In my point of view, freedom is the most necessary for artists to express their ideas for many reasons, in other words, they have to be free to show their mind and their job.
Art is a great form of communication and has become is an essential part of human civilization. It is argued by some that the artists need complete freedom of expression to develop innovative ideas, whereas, others believed that the artists' freedom should be restricted. I partially agree with this statement, artists should be given enough freedom of expression, but total freedom is not required.
Some believe that artists require creative freedom to express themselves, while other think that it might have a detrimental effect on the society. This essay will argue that despite that artists have the ability to influence many individuals negatively, the benefit of being able to raise social awareness through their work of art far outweighs any negative drawback.
While some people believe that artists should be given a certain amount of independence in order to maintain their creativity. Others believe that it is important to give them absolute liberty to express their ideas and thoughts. I completely agree that it is crucial for artists to give them some freedom but not a total one. It is because in this life we have law and norm that prohibit us to do as we like. This includes artist who should respect this regulation that we create order in society. This essay will discuss this view using examples to support the argument and demonstrate some points.
Artists require some freedom to develop their creativity. Although some people opine that artists should be totally free to express any thoughts and ideas, however I fully agree with this opinion. Therefore, my inclination is justified in the ensuing paragraphs.
While one half of the population thinks people who work in the creative arts should have unlimited liberty, the other half believes that their freedom should be limited. I strongly agree with the idea that their liberty should be limited. Because limitless freedom can harm the society in many ways.
Art expresses the thoughts of human mind. It can be related to the beauty of nature, culture and traditions and situations of society. The creativity of art doesn't give only feeling of joy and happiness, but also learn some good lesson to make aware the people about their surroundings. People argue that complete freedom should be given to artists so that they can develop their ideas properly. I agree with this statement and I will discuss my viewpoints in subsequent paragraphs.
Artists require a certain amount of freedom for the development of their creativity whereas it is thought by some people that artists must have complete freedom for the expression of any thoughts and ideas. In my opinion, I believe that though art is a form of human expression and is vital for everyone, providing complete freedom to express all sorts of ideas would have detrimental effects on individuals and society.
There is an opinion that artists should unlimited rights of expression of their vision and viewpoints. I totally disagree with this notion, because it may violate other people’s rights and increase tension in society.
Art is a powerful form of communication and is an indispensable part of human civilization. Artists require the freedom of expression to some extent to develop innovative ideas. Some people argue that full concentration to express any opinions and ideas need to be given to artists. Personally, I recommend artist be given enough freedom to put on their inspiration, but total concentration is not required
Nobody can deny that artists need freedom to improve their own ingenuity. Although some people think that artist's ideas should be restricted, I strongly advocate artists should entirely freedom.
Creativity is like a free bird which can fly as high as possible. You cannot restrict one's imagination because of societal pressure. An artist can only show his or her creative ability if he is given enough freedom. But at the same it has been observed, some people try to misuse this freedom and spread negativity in the surroundings.