Both government and individuals are spending a large amount of money for protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree?

There is no doubt that, animals are illegally being hunted for

foods

Accept comma addition

foods, food

food

(plural of

food

is

food

benefit

good

since it is an uncountable noun.)

and

Suggestion

And

decorative purposes in many parts of the world, and to protect them from hunters, governments spend huge sums of money.

Eventhough

Suggestion

Even though

I largely agree that governments should prioritise

this

money to solve the issues of

humans

Accept comma addition

humans, such

such

as

poverty

and

health

care

, I believe that the state has the responsibility to protect animal

species

to a certain extent. Admittedly, the primary responsibility of every government is to

fullfill

put in effect

fulfil

the fundamental rights of its citizens

such

as

food

, cloth,

health

care

(Connect

such

as with fundamental rights.

Moreover

,

food

is not a fundamental right,

…

Accept space

…

is to fulfil the fundamental rights

such

as right to healthy

food

of its citizens.). There are many people in our country who are deprived of

food

and unable to access the quality

health

care

.

Furthermore

,

Accept space

,

unfortunately,

poverty

and

health

care

is

are

Suggestion

being

closely interconnected.

This

is because, when a member

from

Suggestion

of

a destitute family will become gets (use simple present tense) injured or ill, the entire household will ultimately

ends

Suggestion

end

up with low income and high

health

care

costs.

For instance

, the WHO’s World

Health

Organisation’s statistics in the

last

year showed that the infant mortality rate and nutritional deficiency disease

was

Suggestion

were

higher in low income families than in affluent ones.

That is

why, many people favour that

government

Suggestion

the government

should allocate its budget to give preference to mitigate the social evils

such

as

poverty

and famine rather than protection of animals.

In addition

to alleviate

Suggestion

to alleviating

alleviating

this

these social issues, I believe that governments have the responsibility to protect its flora and fauna along with their natural habitat. To elaborate, we are unaware that a vast number of animal and plant

species

are dwindling in number due to poaching and human encroachment (be specific and leave no vagueness) other reasons.

Consequently

, they are

at

Suggestion

on

the verge of extinction, and

thus

leading (are THEY leading to loss of biodiversity. Use a word that refers to “the verge of extinction”)

this

leads to loss of biodiversity which is essential for healthy and functional ecosystem.

Moreover

, these plant and animal

species

are vitally important to prevent epidemics and to protect the public from diseases.

For example

, a lot of vaccines are derived from the chemicals produced by animals.

Therefore

, wildlife conservation programmes and management of financial resource for animal protections

also

need attention. In conclusion, it is believed by some that animal protection campaigns and programmes are given wide preferences by authorities. Despite I widely strongly believe that a government should bestow more importance to the

health

and

poverty

of its citizens,

however governments

Accept comma addition

however, governments

practices to protect the endangered

species

should not be underrated.