In recent times, pet related injuries and mortalities recent times, pet related injuries and mortalities have sparked heated debates about whether it is healthy for children to be around pets. In
this
essay I shall argue that Linking Words
such
dangers are overemphasised and that children receive substantive psychological benefits through having pets.
Linking Words
To begin
with, Linking Words
although
exotic pets (e.g. Snakes, spiders, apes, etc.) Have been known to occasionally hurt and even kill children, Linking Words
such
incidents are so statistically rare as to be negligible. Linking Words
This
is because the overwhelming majority of children have non-lethal cats, dogs, fish, rodents and rabbits for pets. Linking Words
For example
The Child Safety Institute found that over 90% of the children owned the aforementioned pets, and professed that they had never felt in the least bit endangered by them. Seen in Linking Words
this
light, it is clearly unfounded to claim that pets present any physical danger to children.
Linking Words
Secondly
, pets can impact positively upon child psychology. Linking Words
This
is because young pet owners frequently empathise with their pets and perform a diverse range of actions to maintain their well being (e.g. Feeding, grooming, administering medicine, etc.). Linking Words
For example
, the Cambridge Developmental Psychology Unit found that children who had grown up with pets were 30% less likely to bully others and resolve conflicts through aggression. Linking Words
Consequently
, it is undeniable that a child’s pro-Linking Words
sociality
and mental health can be improved through exposure to pets.
In conclusion, the cited evidence provides strong support for the view that children owning pets is a good thing. In the future, as more laws are introduced to ban the ownership of illegally acquired exotic pets, Suggestion
this
viewpoint will no doubt surge in popularity.Linking Words
roy_shovan