Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement given.

There is no doubt that transport has become a topic of conversation in recent years, especially in our fast-moving, modern world;

however

, it has to be considered that GOVERNMENTS should spend money on railways

INSTEAD

OF roads. I COMPLETELY disagree with the statement given, for three main reasons, which will be addressed here. Perhaps the

first

main reason could be that public transport involving railways

is

Suggestion

has been

often slow and unreliable. Indeed, people can spend less time on their commute choosing THEIR own car. If the governments invest more money in

road

infrastructure

,

this

will be the solution.

This

is vital. A good example can be seen back in my homeland Romania, where the government invested in improving

road

conditions.

Secondly

, THE metro system and trains are often dirty and crowded.

Furthermore

, people are spending LONG ENOUGH TIME IN THEIR COMMUTE and

this

might be quite exhausting.

This

is a major problem.

For instance

, THE German government invests a significant amount of money in improving

road

infrastructure

which leads to a convenient transport solution.

This

might help to alleviate traffic congestion. Turning to the

last

reason, it may reduce pollution. Indeed, nowadays people are more and more interested IN OWNING an electric car which can reduce pollution considerably. If GOVERNMENTS ARE funding

road

infrastructure

,

this

will IMPROVE.

For example

, THE SWEDISH government is giving financial support TO people who buy THEIR

first

electric car.

This

is essential. In conclusion, I totally disagree with the statement given for the following reasons: the railway

infrastructure

is not only slow and unreliable, but

also

crowded, WHILE the

road

infrastructure

might lead to a reduced level of pollution. Without doubt, investing in roads could be the cornerstone.