Government give lot of support to artists even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been used elsewhere

Government has been providing more financial help to artists. While some would argue that

this

scheme should continue, I believe that those funds should be

instead

spent on

development

Suggestion

the development

of other sectors those need more focus. On the one hand, giving the financial aid to artists to help them excel in their career.

This

is because artists have trouble in making money to meet their month end expenses at starting stage of career

thus

helping them financially result in focusing on work.

For example

, a report put out by the Times of India shows that the increasing number of experts in classical dance since a decade is due to the aid given by the administration as most of the artisans are switching to another profession because of poor financial status.

However

, I believe that authorities should use money in the sector where there is a lack of

development

.

On the other hand

, it is thought that departments that are falling behind in

development

need more focus.

This

is to say that in countries like Uganda, Brazil, and Srilanka, primary and secondary schools do not have basic facilities

such

as drinking water, restrooms, compound walls, and sanitation

as a result

, children are at high risk of falling ill,

finally

leading to hospitalization. Utilizing funds in

this

sector result in improved amenities,

therefore

ensures student safety.

For instance

, a survey conducted by the UNESCO across the world found that 65% of people desire are that the Government should use money to develop the sector where there is less growth. In conclusion,

although

giving financial assistance to craftsman and craftswoman helps in career improvement, spending those funds for the

development

of deprived sectors is a more preferable option.