In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes in there. What is your opinion about this?

With increasing population all over the globe, there is a clear need for more homes. Rural areas seem to be the only accessible land to fulfil the housing need.

However

,

living accommodation

Suggestion

the living accommodation

is of critical importance; some keep preserving the greenfield lands in perspective. I entirely approve of

this

idea and elaborate on the reasons as follows.

Initially

, house construction in countries will impose a severe threat to natural landscapes. It means that putting up new houses not only may ruin the natural beauty, but

also

exert pressure on the whole ecosystem.

This

consequently

might take a toll on wildlife and green space in the long run, leaving graver concerns. Not to mention that developing

such

new living facilities will deprive future generations of exploring and enjoying nature’s bounties. Another reason why I disagree with construction in villages is that responsible authorities should tackle the housing issue within the existing settlements rather than create new ones.

In other words

, completing well-designed buildings

does not bring

Suggestion

do not bring

an end to the housing need

since

Suggestion

for

other than homes, essential systems for human

habitation including

Accept comma addition

habitation, including

transportation, financial, and, educational infrastructures have to be taken into consideration. For

this

reason, it is advisable to solve the accommodation crisis in the cities

instead

of country sides, where roads, railways, banks, schools, and, most importantly, employment facilities are already available. In conclusion, I believe that housing development in rural areas shall be banned as it will harm natural landscapes and impose additional investment in infrastructures.