A PERSON'S WORTH NOWADAYS SEEMS TO BE JUDGED ACCORDING TO SOCIAL STATUS AND MATERIAL POSSESSIONS. OLD-FASHIONED VALUES, SUCH AS HONOUR, KINDNESS AND TRUST, NO LONGER SEEM IMPORTANT. TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THIS OPINION?

It is often considered that now treating the individuals due to their social
status
and material possessions dominates in the society in comparison with passe importance like honour, kindness and trust. I completely agree with
this
position and think that
this
condition frequently comes across in an e
very day
found in the ordinary course of events
everyday
life.
First
of all, as society develops, people measure human dignity by wealth and social
status
.
In other words
, in most c
ountries there
Accept comma addition
countries, there
are social hierarchies and inhabitants are mainly organised into different levels of social
status
from highest to lowest.
Therefore
, well-to-do residents are always r
espected even
Accept comma addition
respected, even
though they are not knowledgeable, trustful or kind.
Hence
,
although
the poor are clever or f
rank they
Suggestion
frankly, they
frankly they
are not appreciated by the rich.
For instance
, if the wealthy person's son loves the poor one's daughter, the boy's parents never agree to their marriage because of their prestige as well as the distinction between their pedigrees.
Secondly
, social hierarchies
also
influence on h
umans' work
Suggestion
the humans' work
and study. It means that unless someone is prosperous, they encounter many difficulties while finding j
ob
Suggestion
a job
or studying. Because their experiences and skills are not estimated properly. So that they have a slight chance compared to wealthy heirs. To illustrate, the youth of South Korea study at specialised schools and colleges that are separated according to their social
status
. Provided that one of the poor studies with affluent peers at one school together, the rich always outrage them. By way of conclusion, I strongly believe that categorizing the humans due to their social
status
or material possessions is not p
roper way.
Suggestion
the proper way
a proper way
Inhabitant's positive characteristics are much more crucial rather than wealth.
Submitted by shahobov1995 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: