Some believe that to give opportunities to the new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire. Do you agree or disagree?

A popular belief is that the predecessors who are over 55 had better give more chances for the younger

generation

.

However

, I opine that it is unnecessary for the forego

ers to un

a person who comes from a foreign country; someone who does not owe allegiance to your country

foreigners

dertake

this

order owing to their years of experience.

First

and foremost, people who have worked in a

company

for a long time would become the key factors of that

company

. As they gain knowledge and experience day by day with a cluster of work and various kinds of people. The older

generation

has spent their youth, attempted persistently to contribute to the

company

prosperity.

Moreover

, after years attaching to the

company

, they certainly went through ups and downs at work.

As a result

, those forerunners are supposed to be the model for the youngsters.

Nevertheless

, the young

generation

nowadays is appreciated immensely. Due to their ambition, the inquisitive spirit,

also

the advance of technology. All of them has supported the millennials really much. Being young is

also

a privilege as they are always energetic and desired to prove themselves.

Besides

, as I mentioned before technology is a crucial part for almost work so the elderly who are considered to be comput

er-illit

Suggestion

computed

erate might have difficulty in their job. That's why the younger

generation

is significantly honoured. To sum up, even though the youngsters are talented in different aspects, the old employees should not be encouraged to retire. The combination between experiences of the preceding

generation

and the enthusiasm, creativity of the young would become the perfect catch.