Creative artists should always have the freedom to express their ideas in any way they wish. The government should not restrict what they do. To what extent do you agree with this opinion.

The thinking that ideas in general, is only limited by one’s imagination, has been engraved upon students of many generations for years and will be for many more. To be more specific, art, assuming the person in context is a competent artist, should
also
be only seized when
this
artist cannot make up new ideas.
However
, in certain parts of the world if not all, a certain list of ideas and topics are completely forbidden, which raised the questions: Should artists be free to speak whatever they want through their art? Should the government restrain those specific topics and why did they do so? I am no artist as the best I can draw are
stickmen
, but I would like to flow out my opinion that I have an understanding for both while leaning a bit more towards the artists, and will explain more in
this
text.
First
of all, artists should be allowed to express themselves and their spirit children in
however
way they want. Whether it be sound tracks, paintings, comics,
Youtube
Suggestion
YouTube
videos, Tiktok uploads, or even a real life campaign, and many other ways, is up to their conscious decisive mind and their budget to decide. The amount of possible outputs is only limited by how many ideas they can come up with during their available time and how healthy they are to continue working. The freedom of choice is there, for them to freely use it
however
they wish to. And those who run the
country
should have no problem, and no say on
this
matter. The problem, though, lies in what kind the creator is
blowing
Suggestion
blown
into their form of media. Let it be general topics like housing, school, office work, marriage, or more specific topics like
Dota
a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn
data
2 Lina
cosplays
, Donald Trump fan fictions,
vaporwave
music or even Minecraft music block memes, the worst the government might say is that the work not interesting, which is fine considering everyone has not the same taste for art.
On the other hand
, topics like encouraging war and terrorism, revealing top secret military secrets, brainwashing others to believe in nonsense leading to death of many, should absolutely be forbidden by all means possible. One prime example taken from Vietnam, is that despite the
country
is becoming more and more democratic regardless of the Socialist part in its full name: members of the old Republic of Vietnam, or so called the old South Vietnam, along with their offspring and followers, whom considered traitors by today Viets due to them leaving their
country
during its worst time, has been making up fake stories of the authorities being mere puppets and building rallies and campaign trying to falsely educate others that their hoax are real, and a riot is needed. Many of them have still
lives
Suggestion
lived
in Vietnam, and is day by day spreading fallacy by posting on the nation’s most used social media- Facebook. The government has
labeled
bearing or marked with a label or tag
labelled
them potential terrorists, and has been doing their best in combating them. Coming to a conclusion, it is safe to say that artists, while doing what they love for the passion and the thickness of their wallet, should relate to social norms within his or her community of media, and always play by the laws. No matter what they might
make
engage in
do
, from formal newspaper writing to Discord
nitro
Suggestion
Nitro
pepe
Suggestion
Pepe
pep
frog
gifs
something acquired without compensation
gifts
, all are accepted as long as they fall under the law in their residency
country
.
Submitted by mrfizzemail on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: