Some people opine that students should be supported to evaluate or criticize teachers, while others are worried that these acts would lead to a chaotic classroom. I personally side with the former view because
this
two-way communication helps instructors refine their teaching methods and enables students to become more involved in the lessons.
Linking Words
To begin
with, educational standards can be raised because instructors can modify their ways of delivering lessons based on the students’ feedbacks. If, Linking Words
for example
, the class is slow, it will be ineffective for instructors teach too fast so that most students would fail to retain the information. Linking Words
Therefore
, based on the comments of students, lecturers would find it easier to know the appropriate speed of the lesson is appropriate for the class, and adjust themselves to their students. Linking Words
This
would result in enhanced pedagogical methods of teachers.
Linking Words
Furthermore
, I believe giving students the freedom in expressing their thoughts and feelings would enable them to become more proactive. Linking Words
For instance
, many countries are promoting students-centred teaching with two-way communication, where open discussions between teachers and students are encouraged. Linking Words
This
approach has a clear advantage of making students become more involved in studying. Increased participation in classroom activities helps pupils understand and memorize lessons faster, which eventually improves the educational outcomes.
In conclusion, I believe allowing students to make judgement on teachers would result in better pedagogical methods of the instructors and increased engagement of pupils in lessons. Linking Words
Consequently
, I prefer the opinion that Linking Words
this
measure should be encouraged to enhance educational quality, despite the risks of disrespect and indiscipline.Linking Words