Motor vehicle crashes are one of the leading causes of teen deaths. To prevent such road accidents, the government should ban people under 24 to drive motorcycles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It has long been a subject of discussion whether the government should ban people driving a motor vehicle who under 24 to avoid accidents or vice-versa. In my opinion, the former notion has several strong elements that deserve attention and I will explain why using pertinent arguments. My viewpoint has a myriad of arguments. The most perceptible one, to start with, lies in the fact that the majority of accidents in

this

society were caused by the youngster. Not only does it reveal some astonishing figures prove that over speeding is the main cause

for

Suggestion

of

the crashes

which

Suggestion

Which

are mostly involved by the youngster, but it

also

encourages one to consider more details

further

down the track that gives transparent and logical reasoning to the people about

this

issue is disobeying the road rules. Self-evidently, all these viewpoints stand

society

an extended social group having a distinctive cultural and economic organization

Society

in good stead as far as people's life is concerned. Another vital facet of the argument is that, based on some real-time facts and figures, in Australia, 90% of

accident

Suggestion

the accident

was controlled by imposing

this

rule.

Besides

, a few perks, it is up to the authorities to

further

educate people about the road rules and allow them to take a sensible decision on the road while driving.

Therefore

, it is quite evident why many are in favour of my stance. From what has been discussed, one can conclude that the benefits of banning youngster to drive motorcycles are indeed too great to ignore.