All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?

There has been a tendency that cars that burn fossil fuels is contributing major in air pollution and due to

this

Linking Words

, the electric cars should take place of the engine combustion cars. I completely agree because electric car produces zero emission of pollutant and facilitate the saving of non-renewable fuels. Electric cars are more environmentally friendly and help to improve overall air quality. It does not involve burning of fuels

such

Linking Words

as petrol and diesel which are the main source of toxic gases

such

Linking Words

as carbon dioxide and sulphur.

Linking Words

Although

Suggestion

Despite

the higher number of electric cars will increase high demand of electricity production, it can be produced by using renewable energy sources

such

Linking Words

as solar energy and wind energy which generate nearly null pollution.

For example

Linking Words

, in India, the government has introduced one rule of having one electric car per house few years ago, and

this

Linking Words

resulted in a low level of overall pollution in the country. Electric cars would save fossil fuels to being extinct. Replacing traditional diesel and petrol cars with the electric cars would help to reduce human’s overall dependency on fossil fuels, and ultimately save the non-renewable fuels for future generation. Recent research, for an instant, says that if we continue to use engine combustion cars, we will be soon left out of precious fossil fuels, which required hundreds of years, and replacement of old traditional cars with car runs on electricity would be the best solution. In conclusion, I agree that fossil fuels burning cars should be replaced by electric cars because of its benefits

such

Linking Words

as less production of bad gases in the air and less dependency on rare fossil fuels.