More and more people are using computers and electric devices to access information, so there is no need for printed books, magazines and newspaper. To what extent do you agree or disagree？

It is true that people prefer to exchange information through computers now. Some people argued that printed books, magazines and newspaper should be replaced by electric devices. I completely disagree with

this

idea.

First

of all, there are still many people can’t use int

ernet to

Suggestion

the internet

access information. Some people are not educated on how to use electronic devices.

For example

, many elderly people are not familiar with phones and computers. They are always confused by so many functions in electronic devices. As they are used to reading pri

ntprinted pr

Accept comma addition

print, printed

print printed

oducts, they still need newspapers and magazines. And

also

not all people can afford the high price of electric devices.

Moreover

, some people lived in a place where cannot connect in

In

Suggestion

on

with

to

ternet, they still rely on newspapers.

Secondly

, printed books are less likely cause eye strain. It is healthier when people need to read for long hours, which helps them cultivate a habit of deep reading. If all printed products are replaced, people will inevitably watch the screen of electronic devices for a long time, which may damage their eyes.

Secondly

, there are a lot of fake news and articles posted online as everyone can post art

icle on

Suggestion

articles

line.

However

, printed works are more reliable.

For example

, in cas

e of

Suggestion

the case

newspapers, the sources of news are confirmed, people can trust it. In conclusion,

although

technology is developing fast, it cannot completely replace the traditional ways of accessing news and information. Online sources may continue to grow significantly, but printed products are still widely needed in our daily life.