Because of rising cost of housing, many young people are increasingly being forced to live their parents into their 30s. Are there more advantages disadvantages to this trend?

In recent decades,

violence

in movies and on televisions has been inspiring some fear among the public due to its implications for the community. Some people believe that the authorities should impose censorship on

such

movies and TV programmes to reduce crime rates.

Although

this

idea appears reasonable, it cannot be viewed as the ultimate approach for the government to reduce violent crimes in today’s

society

. In

this

essay, some reasons supporting

this

view will be discussed. It is true that brutal scenes delivered by the media would potentially have positive effects on children’s minds and people’s behaviour since they provide some important life lessons.

For instance

, the film “Avengers: Endgame”, which contains a large number of violent scenes, is

also

a story about power, family and humanity.

Therefore

, it gets much appreciation in the

society

for its substance.

As a result

, it seems unnecessary for the authorities limit the amount of

violence

in films and on televisions. It is believed that the government should take other measures

instead

of censoring the duration of violent scenes in the media to reduce crimes in the

society

. In fact, extreme poverty and despair are more likely than media

violence

to drive a person to commit a crime.

As a result

, it is crucial that the authorities should promote more social welfare in order to prevent people from violent behaviour.

Thus

, it is unimportant to control the amount of

violence

in films,

although

it may have a few negative impacts on public awareness. In conclusion,

violence

in movies and on televisions is not completely responsible for increasing crime rates in the

society

. It is recommended that the government should improve living conditions of citizens to decrease the violent crimes in the

society

.