: Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward student who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

People have different views, whether schools should reward students who show outstanding achievement or students who display great progress. While there are some obvious benefits to give awards to the toppers

however

, I strongly believe that it could be better if schools appreciate students who demonstrate continuous advancement. There are several reasons why people might argue that only high score attaining students deserve prizes. The

first

reason is that it creates competitive environments among the institution when peoples receive recognition it drives them to outplay their competitors. As a consequence

,

Accept space

,

they remain ahead in the future job market from their counterparts. Another reason is that

,

Accept space

,

their hard work should be recognized and the only way to do

this

by providing extra benefits than others

such

as offering scholarship. It can

therefore

be argued that only meritorious students worth the

prize

the property of having material worth (often indicated by the amount of money something would bring if sold)

price

even by schools. In spite of the above arguments, I support the view that students who continue to shine academically

also

should get rewarded by their respective schools.

Firstly

, when they honoured because of their improvement, it encourages them to perform even better in

next years

Suggestion

the next years

.

As a result

, they end up getting good grates in exam.

Secondly

,

this

could give equal chances for every student to receive awards which would deter the gap between top classmates. In conclusion, for the reason mentioned above why people prefer rewarding students with highest result, but it seems to me that it is far better to give inspiration to those who have met constant improvement.