Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children? You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
#childhood #diseases #vaccines #parents #law #immunise #children #individuals #right #support #arguments #evidence
In today’s world, vaccines play a crucial role in preventing numerous childhood
diseases
, ensuring
public Correct word choice
and ensuring
health
and safety. There is ongoing debate about whether parents should be legally required to immunize their children
or whether they should have the freedom to choose. In my opinion, it is essential that parents are mandated by law to vaccinate their children
, as the benefits far outweigh the individual’s right to opt-out
Correct your spelling
opt out
due to
personal beliefs.
First and foremost, vaccinations are a scientifically proven method to prevent serious illnesses, such
as measles, polio, and whooping cough. These diseases
, if left unchecked, can lead to significant health
complications, permanent disabilities, or even death. When a large portion of the population is vaccinated, herd immunity is established, protecting those who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons. Therefore
, mandatory immunization ensures the well-being of the community as a whole, minimizing the risk of outbreaks that could affect vulnerable individuals.
Secondly
, allowing parents the right to choose whether to vaccinate their children
not only puts their own child
at risk but Fix the agreement mistake
children
also
endangers public health
. For instance
, the resurgence of diseases
like measles in recent years has been linked to declining vaccination rates. This
decline can largely be attributed to misinformation and fear surrounding vaccines, which are often unfounded. If left to individual choice, vaccination rates could drop significantly, leading to the re-emergence of preventable diseases
and overwhelming healthcare systems.
Critics argue that mandating vaccines infringes on personal freedoms and parental rights. While
individual freedom is an important principle, it cannot override the greater good of public health
. Protecting society from preventable diseases
should take precedence over personal choice, especially when the lives of others, including those who are immunocompromised, are at stake.
In conclusion, childhood immunization should be enforced by law to protect not only individual children
but also
the broader community. The consequences of not vaccinating far outweigh any perceived infringement on personal rights, making mandatory vaccination a necessary measure in safeguarding public health
.Submitted by almansouradel1 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
To further enhance the clarity of your argument, consider introducing specific statistical data or studies that support your points. This can make your essay more persuasive and grounded in solid evidence.
coherence cohesion
Although your essay is well-structured, make sure each paragraph transitions smoothly to the next. Use brief concluding sentences or phrases at the end of paragraphs to sum up your points and introduce the next idea.
coherence cohesion
Your essay is well-organized, with a logical flow from introduction to conclusion. Each paragraph supports your main argument effectively.
task achievement
You have successfully addressed the task requirements, presenting a clear and comprehensive argument on the necessity of mandatory vaccinations.
task achievement
Your main points are well-supported and articulated, making the essay compelling and informative.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.