Avoiding preventable illnesses is the responsibility of individuals and their families not government

In recent years the debate of who held the priority to avoid preventable illnesses between individuals and the jurisdiction has gained a lot of traction. The power,

in particular

, is always getting the heat when it comes to

this

debate. People regularly seek to blame the state for the slightest mistake they made, especially now when the whole world is on a global scale lockdown, people still hold the rule accountable for their inability to prevent and contain the spread of the viral outbreak, even though the rule has at least tried to provide some sort of basic countermeasure.

Furthermore

, the force should not always be 100% held responsible in avoiding preventable disturbance in society, but rather it comes down to the individual seriousness of the people itself to truly avoid preventable ailment The research from W.H.O (World well-being Organization) suggests that 6 of the 10 leading factors contributing to the global burden of disease can be attributed to lifestyle. Lifestyle has played a major role in causing a disturbance in a more modern nation, and lifestyle is not something that the power could directly control because it’s something that comes down to the individual characters and behaviour of the person. A thing

such

as unsafe

/

unprotected sex, alcoholism, high cholesterol diet, and usage of tobacco is

also

something

that is

deeply rooted in behaviour, those

such

things are the factors which causes the most common malady

/

diseases in today's society. Many governments of the world have spent billions to combat obesity, alcoholism, HIV

/

AIDS yet the problem persists.

This

just proves that many people are still irresponsible with their well-being and why individual duty is key to avoid

this

metra of avoidable illnesses, as even the country

such

as Finland and England with the most developed well-being care system in the world suggest to its people that individual influence for strength and well being are

also

important Some people might say that

this

point of view has a flaw because how could someone be held responsible for their well-being when they have mental incompetence, addictive behavior, or perhaps cultural pressure, certainly these people wouldn’t be held accountable right ?. While there is no denying

such

a statement, but it’s only true to some extent.

This

is why an individual can’t be 100% held responsible for their strength, both law and individual people must have the restraint to some degree, but the greater emphasize are put on the individual itself. As for an example, a state could provide a plethora of vaccines for various diseases

such

as measles, yellow fever, chickenpox, influenza, etc., these vaccines-able diseases could kill 2.5 million people each year if left untreated base upon W.H.O report from 2012. Now imagine that there is a woman that refuses to be vaccinated because he

/

she thinks vaccines wouldn’t do anything. It can clearly be seen that individual gravity is

also

needed to avoid preventable malady

/

diseases, and from the previous example

that is

the power of that customer to vaccinate her

/

himself In summary individual interest is needed to avoid preventable diseases, but a woman can’t be held 100% responsible for their well-being since they potentially inhabit some disabilities that prevent them to do so,

hence

why some sort of government responsibility is

also

required to complete the whole cycle. The preventable disturbance in society is commonly caused by the behaviour.