In recent years the debate of who held the priority to avoid preventable illnesses between individuals and the jurisdiction has gained a lot of traction. The power,
, is always getting the heat when it comes to
debate. People regularly seek to blame the state for the slightest mistake they made, especially now when the whole world is on a global scale lockdown, people still hold the rule accountable for their inability to prevent and contain the spread of the viral outbreak, even though the rule has at least tried to provide some sort of basic countermeasure.
, the force should not always be 100% held responsible in avoiding preventable disturbance in society, but rather it comes down to the individual seriousness of the people itself to truly avoid preventable ailment
The research from W.H.O (World well-being Organization) suggests that 6 of the 10 leading factors contributing to the global burden of disease can be attributed to lifestyle. Lifestyle has played a major role in causing a disturbance in a more modern nation, and lifestyle is not something that the power could directly control because it’s something that comes down to the individual characters and behaviour of the person. A thing
as unsafe
unprotected sex, alcoholism, high cholesterol diet, and usage of tobacco is
something
deeply rooted in behaviour, those
things are the factors which causes the most common malady
diseases in today's society. Many governments of the world have spent billions to combat obesity, alcoholism, HIV
AIDS yet the problem persists.
just proves that many people are still irresponsible with their well-being and why individual duty is key to avoid
metra of avoidable illnesses, as even the country
as Finland and England with the most developed well-being care system in the world suggest to its people that individual influence for strength and well being are
important
Some people might say that
point of view has a flaw because how could someone be held responsible for their well-being when they have mental incompetence, addictive behavior, or perhaps cultural pressure, certainly these people wouldn’t be held accountable right ?. While there is no denying
a statement, but it’s only true to some extent.
is why an individual can’t be
100% held responsible for their strength, both law and individual people must have the restraint to some degree, but the greater emphasize are put on the individual itself. As for an example, a state could provide a plethora of vaccines for various diseases
as measles, yellow fever, chickenpox, influenza, etc., these vaccines-able diseases could kill 2.5 million people each year if left untreated base upon W.H.O report from 2012. Now imagine that there is a woman that refuses to be vaccinated because he
she thinks vaccines wouldn’t do anything. It can clearly be seen that individual gravity is
needed to avoid preventable malady
diseases, and from the previous example
the power of that customer to vaccinate her
himself
In summary individual interest is needed to avoid preventable diseases, but a woman can’t be held 100% responsible for their well-being since they potentially inhabit some disabilities that prevent them to do so,
why some sort of government responsibility is
required to complete the whole cycle. The preventable disturbance in society is commonly caused by the behaviour.