Many office authorities impose restriction on smoking within the offices premises. Some governments have even banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom. What are your opinions on this?

Smoking would be one of the common habits

,

Accept space

,

which devour the

health

of the

person

,

Accept space

,

although

,

Accept space

,

it has terminal consequences.

Hence

, many offices and governments Authorities have been prohibited

this

practice in the public domains as well as office

sites

a musical composition of several movements only loosely connected

suites

.Some Argue that

,

Accept space

,

Though it’s a good practice

,

Accept space

,

It is an intervention to the liberty of a personal freedom

,

Accept space

,

Having said that I strongly disagree

to

Suggestion

with

this

argument.In my opinion smoking is injurious to

health

not only its users but

also

in the vicinity to them. To commence with the demerits of smoking

,

Accept space

,

when a

person

is interacting with public domains they should’ve responsible to their surroundings. If a

person

has

this

habit it

Accept comma addition

habit, it

will affect the children mostly.Smoking has terminal consequences,

hencehence

, the surrounded ones

also

badly pitfall to the

health

concerns.

Moreover

, children will have a detrimental influence on the behavioural aspect.

For instance

, Children will think that smoking is a heroic act and they will try to mimic the elders, especially movies and advertisements depict smoking as manhood behaviour

,

Accept space

,

Thus

,

Accept space

,

it is irrefutable fact that

,

Accept space

,

when a

person

smoke on the public domain

,

Accept space

,

it is

such

an inconvenience to others due to the smoke and the bad smell and

also

terminal

health

concerns

also

be part and parcel of

this

habit.

Therefore

,

Accept space

,

offices and government authorities should penalise and prohibit

this

act. On the flip side of coin, opponent’s of

this

notion have believed that, their individual liberty is under surveillance.

Therefore

, it is an intervention towards their personal choices and freedom.Another trivial argument is that heavy duty imposed on cigarettes

hence

the government has been benefited.Having considered the arguments and counter arguments, public Heath should be the primary concerns and if the government and other authorities shouldn’t take action it would be considered as scratch the surface. In conclusion

,

Accept space

,

Although

smoking has severe ill effect both individually and personally, many are not refrain from continuing

this

habit.Government and people should put the best foot forward to curb

this

menace

.

Accept space

.

Not only penalty would do

,

Accept space

,

Awareness campaigns

,

Accept space

,

individual counselling and strict regulation need

to implement

Suggestion

implement

to curtail

this

act

.

Accept space

.