Both governments and individuals are spending vast amounts of money protecting animals and their habitat. This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree?

In recent times, expenditure on preservation of animals and their habitats is experiencing a growing popularity by both

government

and its citizens. While some people believe that it is for the best of the environment, others argue that

this

money

should be invested to dispel

poverty

and enhance medical services. In my opinion, it is acceptable to allocate

money

for protecting wildlife;

however

, it should not be at the expense of stopping funds to other crucial sectors.

To begin

with, it is extremely essential to invest

money

on saving animals and their dwelling places.

This

is because, they are an indispensable part of the ecosystem, which ensures the human existence into

this

world to a great extent.

In other words

, humans and animals are

inter-dependent

mutually dependent

interdependent

on each other in order to maintain balance within the ecosystem. If we do not save budget for keeping animals and their habitats safe,

then

this

balance will get disrupted, which would eventually lead to

extinction

Suggestion

the extinction

of both humans and animals. Another point to consider is that animals not only provide us with food but

also

other useful products

such

as medicines, luxurious bags.

For instance

, a recent study published by a renowned university reported that scientists are close to finding the cure of various forms of cancer from a species of shark.

Therefore

, cutting off the funds to conserve animals would take a heavy toll on human lives.

Nevertheless

, despite having reasons to subsidize animal protection, I don’t think

government

should spend its entire finances on

this

alone.

This

is because,

majority

Suggestion

the majority

of the countries are inlaid with lots of alarming problems. One of the most obvious challenges is

poverty

. According to a united nation’s report, more than half of the world’s population is living below the

poverty

line.

This

means that they have either no access or limited access to food, water, shelter or clothing. If

government

Suggestion

the government

had decided to fund animal protection programs only,

then

countless number of people would have died out of

poverty

and starvation.

Moreover

, without strengthening the health care services, people will not be able to expect a disease-free lifespan.

Consequently

, governments need to reserve

money

for tackling these problems as well. In conclusion, while it is true that

government

needs to keep funding to save the animal kingdom for maintaining the biodiversity, it neither can ignore the problems that are likely to arise from

lacking

Suggestion

lack

of investment to eradicate

poverty

and improving medical health care services. In my view, governments and individuals need to find out a balance to expense on these two categories.