Both governments and individuals are spending vast amounts of money protecting animals and their habitat. This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree?

In recent times, expenditure on preservation of animals and their habitats is experiencing a growing popularity by both

government

Use synonyms

and its citizens. While some people believe that it is for the best of the environment, others argue that

this

Linking Words

money

Use synonyms

should be invested to dispel

poverty

Use synonyms

and enhance medical services. In my opinion, it is acceptable to allocate

money

Use synonyms

for protecting wildlife;

however

Linking Words

, it should not be at the expense of stopping funds to other crucial sectors.

To begin

Linking Words

with, it is extremely essential to invest

money

Use synonyms

on saving animals and their dwelling places.

This

Linking Words

is because, they are an indispensable part of the ecosystem, which ensures the human existence into

this

Linking Words

world to a great extent.

In other words

Linking Words

, humans and animals are

inter-dependent

mutually dependent

interdependent

on each other in order to maintain balance within the ecosystem. If we do not save budget for keeping animals and their habitats safe,

then

Linking Words

this

Linking Words

balance will get disrupted, which would eventually lead to

extinction

Suggestion

the extinction

of both humans and animals. Another point to consider is that animals not only provide us with food but

also

Linking Words

other useful products

such

Linking Words

as medicines, luxurious bags.

For instance

Linking Words

, a recent study published by a renowned university reported that scientists are close to finding the cure of various forms of cancer from a species of shark.

Therefore

Linking Words

, cutting off the funds to conserve animals would take a heavy toll on human lives.

Nevertheless

Linking Words

, despite having reasons to subsidize animal protection, I don’t think

government

Use synonyms

should spend its entire finances on

this

Linking Words

alone.

This

Linking Words

is because,

majority

Suggestion

the majority

of the countries are inlaid with lots of alarming problems. One of the most obvious challenges is

poverty

Use synonyms

. According to a united nation’s report, more than half of the world’s population is living below the

poverty

Use synonyms

line.

This

Linking Words

means that they have either no access or limited access to food, water, shelter or clothing. If

Use synonyms

government

Suggestion

the government

had decided to fund animal protection programs only,

then

Linking Words

countless number of people would have died out of

poverty

Use synonyms

and starvation.

Moreover

Linking Words

, without strengthening the health care services, people will not be able to expect a disease-free lifespan.

Consequently

Linking Words

, governments need to reserve

money

Use synonyms

for tackling these problems as well. In conclusion, while it is true that

government

Use synonyms

needs to keep funding to save the animal kingdom for maintaining the biodiversity, it neither can ignore the problems that are likely to arise from

lacking

Suggestion

lack

of investment to eradicate

poverty

Use synonyms

and improving medical health care services. In my view, governments and individuals need to find out a balance to expense on these two categories.