Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults.

People have contradictory views about whether children should be taught to be competitive or cooperative. While an ethos of competition can sometimes be functional in growth, I believe that the potential to cooperate is more supreme. On one hand, competition can be a great source of motivation for children. When teachers use games or prizes to establish an element of competitiveness into lectures, it can hearten children to work harder to outshine the other pupils in the class.

This

kind of hearty vie may help to build children’s self confidence, while pushing them to work on their own and prosper rapidly. When these children leave school, their faith in themselves and will power will help them in competitive situations

such

as job interviews. It can

therefore

be proclaimed that competition should be encouraged in order to prepare children for future endeavours in life.

On the other hand

, it is feasible even more predominant to prepare children for many facets of the future that require cooperation. In the workplace, adults are contemplated to work in unity, follow orders given by their seniors, or superintend and aid the more junior members of staff. Team cooperation skills are much more convenient than a competitive determination to win.

This

is the attitude that I believe schools should stimulate in young people.

Instead

of encouraging the idea that people are either winners or losers, teachers could show children that they achieve way much more from working together. In conclusion, I appreciate the fact that people might want to encourage competitiveness in children, but it seems to me that a cooperative attitude is

much more preferable in

Suggestion

much more preferable

life.