Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the internet, and they can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Some opponents state that children no longer needs to take school to study as they can gain the

knowledge

available through the internet. To me, I hardly accept

this

idea. The argument in favour of schools is no longer necessary would be that students no longer need any tutorial classes by getting the accessible source of

knowledge

through the internet. I believe

this

is an insanely one-sided thinker. The

knowledge

taught in schools has undergone a thorough refinement in order to provide the best education for the development of people from kindergarten to adulthood.

Therefore

, without the curriculum, students will easily be distorted in

knowledge

and ethics, which seriously damage an entire future generation. Schools play a vital role in not only categorizing and selecting the necessary information, but

also

correcting behavioural and emotional orientation in specific situations for each stage that appropriate for the student’s age. To take the elementary stage as an example, children at

this

age begin to form basic

knowledge skills

Accept comma addition

knowledge, skills

and attitudes about nature, society and themselves through learning and education activities. If children choose to learn by using internet

instead

of under the supervision of teachers, they may fall into missing information or be distracted by entertainment programs

such

as games for children of

this

age often lack cognitive and serious attitudes to learning. To conclude my point of view above, I would say that skipping school to choose self-educate by using the Internet would be risky to one's future and schools are irreplaceable.