Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society? Give reasons for your answer.

It is widely admitted that the

freedom

of

speech

is a core part oh human rights. Nowadays,

freedom

of

speech

plays a major role in many aspects of modernised countries’ life and have political implementation.

As a result

, some people believe that

freedom

of

speech

is mandatory for a free

society

.

This

essay is going to analyse

this

dilemma using supporting arguments.

To begin

with,

freedom

of

speech

helps the government to understand people’s wants.

In other words

, the state faces problems with budget allocation by industries,

nevertheless

, honest opinions of individuals could tackle some problems.

Hence

,

this

is one way for the government to assess public feelings and take action to build a brighter future. Regards to

this

fact, the state should encourage

freedom

of

speech

for a

society

, because it is not only beneficial, but

also

a mandatory for progress.

However

,

freedom

of

speech

cannot be absolute, as any other form of

freedom

. No one should have a right to say whatever they want, because it can provoke others and have certain damaging consequences. How American musician Cher said: “Words are weapons”. Regards to

this

quote, it could be clear that

freedom

of

speech

should have limits and law should protect person dignity.

In addition

, a

society

and the world could benefit from

freedom

of

speech

if forbidden it to use to humiliate other people. To conclude, as it mentioned earlier, while

freedom

of

speech

will be regulated and have limits,

society

will benefit. At the same time, it should be protected from too strong regulation, because in a free

society

everyone has a right to express opinion.