Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts & that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view.

Over the years craft was an integral part of our everyday life. A fair amount of people supposes that spending money on pieces of

art

with politics is unreasonable and can be invested rationally. I do not accept the idea that arts and crafts represent the detrimental effect on countries economy.

First

,

this

position will be proven by an analysis of educational level of society and

secondly

, the national property will be explored. For one thing galleries and museums determine social, educational attainment of individuals.

Therefore

, visiting

such

type of facilities, people observe the background of paintings, sculptures and acknowledge the history of masterpieces. Due to

art

people converse with others, share their opinions and

thus

, become more well-educated and versatile.

For instance

, the New York has published the curiosity article, which had shown that the level of education of the city positively alter with the increasing of amount

art

buildings over the

last

20 years. Another reason is that the investment in

art industry

Suggestion

the art industry

contributes to the national asset

fo

appropriate to; intended for

for

to

the country.

In other words

, behind those masterpieces is the hidden talent, who will be famous in the future. A lot of people will be interested in observing and enjoying the origin of the master and

hence

, it will be appreciated by them. France,

for example

, from the ancient times be formed by their artists and plant itself as the place of

art

all over the world. On the whole, taking all written above, I am firmly convinced that the government's wasting resources on

art

is political, whereas define the educational level of population and national value of it.