It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings. This money should be spent on building modern buildings instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, preservation of the old instructors costs a significant amount of money. While some people have a conviction that

this

money would be spent to build modern infrastructures, I will elaborate in

this

essay why I am a strong oppose of

this

approach.

First

and foremost, historic buildings in each place are representative of the culture of the corresponding period. Many of them has been recorded in UNESCO since they are nations’ history.

For instance

, Isfahan is a cultural heritage of Iran and

this

fact is clearly visible from its stony constructions with magnificent paintings back to several centuries ago. Undoubtedly, the level of expenditures on restoring

such

buildings is high but it is worth.

Furthermore

, the tourism industry of some countries strongly attached to these memorable buildings so that they can make a lot of funds which can be replaced in turns of the amount which has been spent. Another vital fact that should be taken into consideration is that living in modern buildings equipped with modern facilities becomes an inevitable part of today’s life. Having access to the latest technologies

such

as automation,

lighting which

Accept comma addition

lighting, which

most of the people are accustomed to use them, could be very deceptive.

Moreover

, applying

such

facilities for modern building with proper infrastructures would be far cheaper in terms of expenses

such

as disposal, reassembling the materials and consulting fee of the experts who should confirm the renewing the building.

Therefore

, economically it does not make sense. On the basis of the point mentioned above, old monuments tell us about the history and we are not allowed to not maintain them with the excuse of waste of money. Even so, buildings that cannot be restored should be destroyed