People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

In
this
developing world, advancements in the communication and transportation sector has enabled individuals to live and do their jobs from anywhere.
This
essay will argue that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
This
essay will
first
demonstrate that with
such
developments people can spend more
time
with their families, followed by an analysis of how the primary disadvantage, namely decreased
work
efficiency, is not valid. As it has become possible to manage the
work
online in many domains, a lot of people choose to
work
from home while in other kind of jobs that doesn't allow to
work
remotely, most people can still go back to their homes every day with improved means of travel.
That is
to say that people can give more
time
to their family members which eventually strengthens the family bond.
For instance
, two different surveys that were conducted 25 years apart in 1990 and 2015, concluded that the percentage of working class people living with their families have spiked by 75%, which according to experts, is a direct consequence of improved technology and transportation systems. Those opposed to
this
say
Suggestion
saying
that working remotely and spending more
time
travelling on the daily basis, adversely affects the
work
efficiency of the workers.
However
, there is no evidence to support
this
view and
such
workers do their job as well as others do.
On the contrary
, ongoing studies suggest that having more family
time
as part of daily life relaxes the mind, which in turn can help in having more creativity at
work
. On balance, the fact that added family
time
makes employees perform better at their
work
clearly outweighs the flawed argument that it impairs
work
efficiency.
Submitted by Sharan Sidhu on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • communication technology
  • transportation
  • advantages
  • disadvantages
  • freedom
  • work and live
  • development
  • increased job opportunities
  • flexibility
  • work-life balance
  • cultural exposure
  • diversity
  • economic growth
  • globalization
  • social isolation
  • loneliness
  • loss of community
  • sense of belonging
  • expensive cost of living
  • housing
  • strain on infrastructure
  • resources
What to do next:
Look at other essays: