Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent in the human population. How far do you agree or disagree?

Some people argue that we are spending too much time and resources on protecting wild animals while

this

money could be better invested in other sectors that can benefit humans ourselves. I completely disagree with

this

point of view. It has been agreed by most scientists that animals have a vital role in sustaining ecological balance and biodiversity. Other people may claim that it would be better to save

this

money and efforts for the sake of humans’ benefits like allocating for poverty elimination, education, etc.

This

is true to some extent, but it should be

born

Suggestion

borne

in mind that no species, even humans, can survive alone in

such

an unbalanced

ecology

Suggestion

ecologically

.

Therefore

, protecting the animals and the environment is

also

another method to protect ourselves and our

next

generation.

This

long-term investment,

thus

, should not be undervalued in any circumstance. One of the reasons is that protecting other animals will help humankind preserve rare genetic resources, which benefit people in many aspects. By researching and experiments, scientists could create new vaccines on medicine to cure many patients thanks to these genes. Human activity is no doubt the main cause of most

problems wild animals

Suggestion

problems with wild animals

face. The human race has continued to destroy the planet and the natural habitats of wild animals and

therefore

should be responsible for protecting them so that they can live wild and free, as is their natural state. In conclusion, there are crucial reasons why we should spend time and money on maintaining a diverse range of animals. I do believe that humans will gain huge benefits from those activities.