With an increasing number of people eating fast food, which if eating too regularly can cause health issues, some people think that the only solution is to ban it completely. To what extent do you agree?

In

this

globalizing and globalized world today among discursive issues the time given above has turned into the global one. I believe that

this

question should be examined from both points of view. On one side of the dispute there are people who debate that the benefits of

this

considerably outweigh its negative aspects. The fundamental reason for

this

is that in Uzbekistan fast food already developing all the countries and if fast foods we will close so my opinion all the nations will be unsatisfied It is

also

possible to say that and if closing fast foods people will save their money. One trustworthy illustration of

this

is after 2 years PRESIDENT will be closing fast foods because in order to protect people their health is.

In addition

is that if eat fast food when a person ache

then

a person's disease will worsen. As we have seen, there are no easy answers to

this

riddle.

On the other hand

, it is

also

possible to establish the opposite context.It is frequently argued that in fact all fast foods must be closed it is all harmful to the health of ladies in Uzbekistan. Individuals often have

this

opinion since when people eat in fast food they don't know that has inside. On balance,

however

, I tend to rely on advantages more than disadvantages which were given above.